fazzi.com
Fazzi Associates

Operational, Quality & Financial Best Pactice

Patient Satisfaction

Staff Satisfaction

Referral Source Satisfaction

Operational Improvement

Interim Management

Strategic and Planning Services

Marketing and Customer Service

Live Webinar and On Demand Training

On Site Training

Association Presentations

OASIS Management

Scheduled Workshops

Home Health Compare Results

Research Reports

Articles

Resources and Calculators

 

The Benchmark Email

...benchmarks, strategies and ideas for improving your agency
A service of Fazzi Associates, Inc.

 

March 19, 2010

Does P4P Work in Home Care?

Question: There has been so much talk about Pay-for-Performance (P4P) in home care. If it were enacted, we wonder if it would really work.

Answer: No need to wonder! The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) began a formal study of the impact of P4P from January 2008 through December 2009 in seven states: Illinois, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, and California. The results are in and they are impressive.

According to CMS, the Home Health Pay-for Performance (HHP4P) Demonstration Project resulted in $15.4 million dollars in savings in 2008, the first year of the effort. Incentive payments are now being awarded to home health agencies that were in their state's highest performance levels, or highest levels of improvement in patient outcomes.

According to NAHC, the $15.4 million in incentive payments will be distributed to the high performer/high improver agencies based on the actual savings to the Medicare program during 2008. Additional incentive payments may be made to participating agencies later this year if Medicare savings are also identified for 2009.

There were seven measures that CMS used for this study:

  • Incidence of Acute Care Hospitalization
  • Incidence of Any Emergent Care
  • Improvement in Bathing
  • Improvement in Ambulation/Locomotion
  • Improvement in Transferring
  • Improvement in Status of Surgical Wounds
  • Improvement in Management of Oral Medications
When agencies focus on accuracy of OASIS assessments, the right care management model and the right services at the right time, very positive outcomes can be achieved. The CMS study clearly demonstrates this. And, while this study focused on outcomes achieved with patients assessed using the OASIS-B instrument, similar outcomes are expected with patients who (as of January 1, 2010) are being assessed using the new OASIS-C instrument.