fazzi.com
Fazzi Associates

Operational, Quality & Financial Best Pactice

Patient Satisfaction

Staff Satisfaction

Referral Source Satisfaction

Operational Improvement

Interim Management

Strategic and Planning Services

Marketing and Customer Service

Live Webinar and On Demand Training

On Site Training

Association Presentations

OASIS Management

Scheduled Workshops

Home Health Compare Results

Research Reports

Articles

Resources and Calculators

 

The Benchmark Email

...benchmarks, strategies and ideas for improving your agency
A service of Fazzi Associates, Inc.

 

February 25, 2010

Learnings from Agency Improvement Efforts

Question: I know that Fazzi Associates has an Operational Review service where you review all the operations of an agency and make very specific recommendations for improvement. I also know that you are one of the few firms to incorporate Lean Management techniques in your recommendations. Within your Operational Reviews, are there common problems that you see among the agencies you work with?

Answer: Before we respond, it is important to first understand the reason an agency might choose to have an Operational Review. In most cases, they are initiated by senior agency directors who recognize their agencies are underperforming or new directors who are anxious to get a full review of the agencies they will be managing. In both scenarios, the goal is to streamline operations and ensure every department is focused on high performance and improvement in three major areas: quality outcomes, financial outcomes, and OASIS performance. We review marketing, intake, clinical performance and productivity standards, quality assurance, medical records, IT, accounting, finance, billing, human resources, and the Organizational Structure/staffing patterns. We look at everything from structure to process to practices to outcomes and most importantly, we give very specific recommendations for improvement.

The answer to your question with regards to common problem areas is yes… and no. Yes, there does tend to be specific problems that consistently show up in most agencies. However, each agency is different, which means there are always operational, process, and system problems unique to each agency.

With that said, there are three problems that we do commonly see:

  1. Agency staffing costs are too high or misaligned. Agencies are not structured in a way that ensures the highest possible operating and quality outcomes at the most efficient cost. Additionally, the clinical model that agencies are using does not allow them to fully succeed in today's home care environment. (The clinical model should be built in order to fully meet the essence of home care – providing the right services, by the right discipline, at the right time in order to meet the patient's needs and to achieve the patient's quality goals.)

  2. Agency processes are inefficient. Agencies have spent years responding to changes by creating work-arounds and add-ons to their operating workflows rather than continuously ensuring that each process and workflow is efficient and effective. This results in cumbersome and inefficient operations where staff are frustrated and outcomes are lower than targeted.

  3. Agencies are not maximizing their Medicare revenue. Agencies are consistently underscoring their patients on the OASIS data set and not coding the episode properly - leaving revenue on the table.

After problem areas are discovered, we find that it often takes an external source to come up with clear, very specific recommendations with substantiation and rationales for what changes need to be made. It also makes it much easier for the leader to make the changes when the recommendations are benchmarked against national standards and are presented from a highly respected outside source.